4
the effect.
largely land
Le
aining chaas
Lo
over 9 million dollars surplus at the beginning
of 1932.
In these circumstances, I think they
are justified in budgeting for a deficit of over
a million dollars in 1952.
This is more than
accounted for by the estimate for Public Works
Extraordinary, which amounts to $2,173,000.
Whether the 1952 estimates are
realised
d is thought be
dependent largely on exchange movements.
I am
not sure, however, that it matters very much to
the Hong Kong Government balance which way the
exchange moves. If the dollar appreciates the
sterling expenditure of the Government is less
burdensome. If it depreciates it acts as a
stimulus to the export trade both of China in
to the munal general and of Hong Kong itself.
Rhines
H 24/1/32
}
The reason
why Hong Long is comparatively, doing so well
Auring the present depression is that it is a
trading, not a producing centre, and so long as
the volume of trade does not decline seriously
it is of less importance to Hong Kong what
prices are being received by the
producers.
original
The details of the estimates are very
adequately explained in the various memoranda
enclosed in the despatch.
I am glad to see
the increased expenditure on education, particularly
grants-in-aid. I suggested recently on a General
file that Hong Kong might well increase its
expen diture on education.
General Division may like to see the
reference to increased expenditure on the
Imperial Institute (p.24).
As regards "loan works", the Colonial
Government
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.